vet-idea

仓库创建 2026年7月27日最近提交 19 小时前SkillHot 收录 8 小时前
▸ 精选理由

把想法科学化评分,适合创业者与产品经理快速决策取舍。

这个 Skill 做什么

以证伪为导向评估创意可行性、竞争态势、许可与合规风险并命名定位。

用严谨的证伪思路评估新产品或功能:界定范围、调查竞品(付费和开源)、评估商业可行性、排查许可与合规风险,然后给出简短易记的命名与定位文案。想知道“有没有人做过”“能不能赚钱”“我漏了什么”或需要命名与市场定位时用。特点是尽量找反例并给出不太好看的评分,而不是只找支持论据。

▸ 展开 SKILL.md 英文原文

Vet a product, app, business, or feature idea against the real market before building it — scope the concept, survey competitors (paid and open source), test commercial viability, clear every source and dependency for licensing and compliance risk, then land a short, memorable name plus positioning and messaging. Use whenever the user wants to plan a new product or app, asks "does this already exist", "is this a good idea", "who else is doing this", "can this be monetized", "what am I missing", "is this name taken", "what should we call it", wants a market assessment, competitive landscape, enhancement backlog, naming, positioning, taglines or marketing copy, or asks whether a data source or library is safe to use commercially (MIT, Apache, GPL/AGPL, ODbL, CC-BY-NC, scraping/ToS). Also run proactively after drafting a spec and before any code is written. Owns the `idea-dossier/` knowledge base. Run early, and revisit whenever the concept shifts. Not for products already shipped with re

研究检索创意评估竞品调研合规风险命名定位通用
0
Stars
0
Forks
4
仓库内 Skill
积累中
7 日增星
安装 / 使用
给你的 Agent 一句话(通用)
帮我安装这个 skill:https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jgobuilds/ai-standards-public/main/skills/vet-idea/SKILL.md
或 curl 直取 SKILL.md
curl -fsSL "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jgobuilds/ai-standards-public/main/skills/vet-idea/SKILL.md"
SKILL.MD 节选查看完整文件 ↗
# Vet an idea

Turn an idea into a decision, backed by research rather than enthusiasm — then
give it a name people remember and a claim you are legally allowed to make.

## The point of this skill

Most idea evaluation is motivated reasoning with citations. This skill is built
to **disconfirm**.

The scoring is meant to be *unflattering*. A vetting pass that returns nothing
but validation is telling the user what they want to hear, and they will stop
trusting it — exactly as a job-scoring system that only produces 8s and 9s
becomes worthless. If a pass produces no corrections, assume the research was
too shallow, not that the idea was flawless.

The valuable findings change the plan: the th
via SKILL·HOT · 数据来自 GitHub 公开信息 · 原文版权归作者所有