map-literature-contradictions

仓库创建 2026年7月7日最近提交 20 天前SkillHot 收录 20 天前

▸ 精选理由

将分歧转为可检验的解释与后续研究线索。

这个 Skill 做什么

把文献中冲突的发现映射、解释并结构化为信息。

把文献里看起来相互矛盾的发现梳理成可用的信息，分出哪些结论是共识、哪些是冲突，并为冲突找出可能的原因（样本、方法、指标或时间差异等）。用在做 literature review、写 related work 或需要把不一致结果写成有说服力综述时。它把“找共识—分离矛盾—解释差异”流程化，让冲突成为推进理解的线索而不是麻烦。

▸ 展开 SKILL.md 英文原文

Analyze conflicting findings in a literature review and turn disagreement into structured insight. Use when the user has papers, abstracts, notes, or claims that disagree and needs to identify consensus, explain contradictions by sample/method/indicator/context/time differences, define explanation boundaries, or write a stronger synthesis section.

研究检索矛盾分析证据合成方法学通用

Stars

Forks

仓库内 Skill

7 日增星

安装 / 使用

给你的 Agent 一句话（通用）

帮我安装这个 skill：https://raw.githubusercontent.com/xingtaxueshu/literature-review-skills/main/skills/map-literature-contradictions/SKILL.md

或 curl 直取 SKILL.md

curl -fsSL "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/xingtaxueshu/literature-review-skills/main/skills/map-literature-contradictions/SKILL.md"

SKILL.MD 节选查看完整文件 ↗

# Map Literature Contradictions

## Goal

Use contradiction as information. Instead of avoiding inconsistent findings, map what researchers agree on, where they diverge, and what hidden conditions or method limits explain the disagreement.

## Workflow: Comb Method

1. Find consensus: list findings repeatedly supported across studies, settings, or methods.
2. Separate contradictions: name the exact claim that conflicts rather than saying "the literature is mixed".
3. Compare study conditions: inspect object, sample, indicator, method, time window, and context.
4. Infer why the difference matters: connect the comparison to theory, mechanism, or validity.
5. Mark explanation boundaries: identi

via SKILL·HOT · 数据来自 GitHub 公开信息 · 原文版权归作者所有