compare-research-methods

仓库创建 2026年7月7日最近提交 20 天前SkillHot 收录 20 天前

▸ 精选理由

帮助论文或提案中以论证方式选择方法并生成清晰的比较表格。

这个 Skill 做什么

比较并论证不同研究方法能回答的问题、局限与适用场景，生成方法表格。

把几种研究方法放到同一张表里比较，说明每种方法能回答什么问题、不能回答什么、适合什么场景，并给出为什么选它的论证。在撰写方法学章节、写 proposal、或需要为方法选择辩护时用，能把“我用这个方法”变成有理有据的论点。特别在于把方法与研究问题直接挂钩，强调局限性与替代方案的权衡。

▸ 展开 SKILL.md 英文原文

Compare research methods for an academic literature review, thesis proposal, or methodology section by linking each method to what it can and cannot answer. Use when the user needs to justify method choice, compare quantitative/qualitative/mixed-method designs, build a methods table, or turn "I will use this method" into a defensible argument tied to the research question.

研究检索方法比较学术写作方法论通用

Stars

Forks

仓库内 Skill

7 日增星

安装 / 使用

给你的 Agent 一句话（通用）

帮我安装这个 skill：https://raw.githubusercontent.com/xingtaxueshu/literature-review-skills/main/skills/compare-research-methods/SKILL.md

或 curl 直取 SKILL.md

curl -fsSL "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/xingtaxueshu/literature-review-skills/main/skills/compare-research-methods/SKILL.md"

SKILL.MD 节选查看完整文件 ↗

# Compare Research Methods

## Goal

Help the user treat method choice as an argument, not a format requirement. Every recommended method should explain what part of the research question it answers, what it cannot answer, and why it fits better than alternatives.

## Workflow

1. Restate the research question and the most important thing it needs to know: breadth, depth, correlation, causality, mechanism, process, comparison, or prediction.
2. List plausible methods rather than jumping to the user's preferred method.
3. Build a three-column comparison: method route, can answer, cannot answer.
4. Identify the tradeoff that matters most for this question.
5. Recommend a method or mixed sequen

via SKILL·HOT · 数据来自 GitHub 公开信息 · 原文版权归作者所有