humanize
帮助作者识别并手工修正 AI-式措辞，降低投稿/审稿中的风格问题风险。
审读 .tex/.qmd/.md 文稿，检测并标记典型的 AI 生成写作痕迹，提供结构化报告。
把 .tex/.qmd/.md 文稿里典型的 AI 口吻痕迹找出来并标注：机械过渡句、AI 词库、破折号滥用、对称段落、三连句和过度模糊的套话。适合投稿、工作论文发布或想去 AI 化前自检使用。输出结构化报告和示例高亮，但不替你改写，作者自己编辑。
▸ 展开 SKILL.md 英文原文
Read-only audit of `.tex`, `.qmd`, or `.md` text for AI-voice tells — boilerplate transitions ("Moreover", "Furthermore", "It is important to note that"), AI-cliché lexicon ("delve", "navigate the complexities", "tapestry", "robust framework"), em-dash overuse, symmetric paragraph shapes, tricolon abuse, hedging stacking, "not only X but also Y" frames, and formulaic openers. Produces a report; does NOT rewrite. Use when user says "humanize", "does this sound like AI?", "check for AI tells", "de-AI this draft", "remove AI voice", "audit my prose for sycophancy", or before journal submission / posting a working paper.
帮我安装这个 skill：https://raw.githubusercontent.com/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/main/.claude/skills/humanize/SKILL.mdcurl -fsSL "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/main/.claude/skills/humanize/SKILL.md"# `/humanize` — AI-voice audit (detect-and-flag) Read the target file (or all paper-like files), audit for the canonical AI-voice tells in academic prose, and write a structured report. **The skill does not rewrite.** The author edits. ## Why this skill exists Referees and editors increasingly recognise AI-generated prose. The tells are not stylistic preferences — they're statistically conspicuous patterns the LLM training distribution produces at higher rates than human academic writers. Five reasons to audit before submission: 1. **Reviewer suspicion is a tax.** Even good substance pays a credibility tax if the prose reads as AI-drafted. 2. **Journal policy is tightening.** A growing n